+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45

Thread: Rules Clarification

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The United Kingdom of England-Land
    Posts
    1,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Choekaas View Post
    People tend to forget the rules that we are given in "Stranger in a Strange Land", a set of rules most likely from Jacob (since they remind of the rules of Mother/Jacob's rules)

    Juliet was sentenced to death by the Rules to the Others because:
    - She killed one of their own, Danny Pickett. In other words: An "Other" is not allowed to kill another "Other".
    - She gave Jack instructions to kill Ben. An "Other" can't kill another "Other" indirectly (through another person that is not one of them)

    These crimes are, by the rules, punished with execution.


    Even though I find it very weird that it's punished by execution, and not banishment (which makes most logical sense considering what we know about The Others now).
    But I find it interesting to put these rules up to. Makes me think more about the rules Ben mentions in "The Shape of Things to Come" and probably what he meant with Widmore breaking the rules.
    Those seem more like laws than the Rules (especially since they can be broken).
    Best Thread On Lostpedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Erowyn View Post
    Jabob? Sounds Jamaican….
    Team Jacob

  2. #12

    Default

    Yet as we saw, Ben could kill Widmore. I agree with Choekaas that the rules Ben refers to in TSOTTC are the code of Others and not unbreakable rules (unless somehow this rule originated with Jacob and also died with him? Eesh...). I expected to see something retroactively explain this conversation as the seasons moved on, but nothing really did...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    256

    Default

    I always thought MiB was stuck as Locke because this whole manifestation was something very different from his ordinary manifestations. He needed the body, he tookover a new form to which he would always come back (f.i. after being the Smoke Monster) - before that this fixed form was Jacob's brother.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jack static View Post
    Yet as we saw, Ben could kill Widmore. I agree with Choekaas that the rules Ben refers to in TSOTTC are the code of Others and not unbreakable rules (unless somehow this rule originated with Jacob and also died with him? Eesh...). I expected to see something retroactively explain this conversation as the seasons moved on, but nothing really did...
    Yeah, I see the only way this rule could be broken is exception to the rule, (rule does not apply once person who makes up the rules is dead.) There is no reason Ben cannot kill widmore when he breaks into his flat. For one, Widmore allegedly "changed the rules" when he killed Alex, so therefore, why not change the rules further and kill Widmore (unless those rules cannot be changed.) 2nd, Ben was already allegedly banished from the island. He wasnt even on the island. We do know that island rules can be still enforced off island from Michael not being allowed to kill himself (island rule, cannot kill oneself if you are a candidate or if the island is not finished with you yet). But if banished from island with rules changing and allegedly not being able to get back to island (neither Ben nor widmore were supposed to be allowed back as per rules of banishment) why would any "Other Code" be enforceable at that moment. Therefore, the only thing I can conclude is that the rule no longer applied because either 1) Jacob was dead...exception via anarchy or 2) Widmore could now die because he served his purpose (bringing desmond to the island) and the island was through with him. Why Ben would suddenly choose to chance this rule to prevent Widmore from saving penny, when he had the chance to kill penny and didnt because she had a kid is beyond me. Why he didnt just shoot Widmore in the first place in his flat then would make no sense.

    Looking over the whole show, I would say Widmore maybe couldnt kill Ben because of a different rule. He had knowledge that Ben had to go back to the island and couldnt alter anything. He couldve found this out via Faraday's journal (if jack, hurley, or kate mentioned to faraday that Ben, Sun and Lapidus also were on the Ajira plane) or Widmore had mentioned that Jacob physically came and talked to him and told him he could not kill Ben because he was needed to win the "war". However, we do know that Ben did not get such a visit from Jacob off island and therefore Ben was obeying a different rule than widmore was, even though the rule was the same. Do not kill Ben because he has to get back to the island or because of whatever happened happened...and Do not kill Widmore because he is an other and they cannot be killed, or MiB Jacob rule of some sort of magic that would not allow Ben to kill widmore.

    The only problem with this theory is that when widmore asked ben if he were there to kill him ben replied that "we both know I cant do that" That would assume they are under the same rule (cannot kill an other no matter what or cannot kill each other because the island wont let them) and they both know it.
    Make sense...thought not.
    Last edited by lostsense; 06-16-2012 at 01:35 AM.

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob90 View Post
    I always thought MiB was stuck as Locke because this whole manifestation was something very different from his ordinary manifestations. He needed the body, he tookover a new form to which he would always come back (f.i. after being the Smoke Monster) - before that this fixed form was Jacob's brother.
    The only thing we have to go on for this rule is what Ilana said. Hes stuck like locke since jacob is dead. Where she got her information can only be assumed (jacob) and whether she was right could only be assumed. Since he never did change to anyone else again, Im going to say she was right...of course maybe she was wrong and all those dead people hurley was talking to was actually MiB...but thats not very likely, even if Michael told him not to blow up the plane which allegedly MiB wanted to use, even though he ended up trying to use the boat.

    We do not know if MiB could change once Jack was the new protector. Since Jacob got to make up his own rules once he was protector and hurley would as well according to Ben (though we dont know if he was right we are just assuming) then jack would have to make it a rule as well. There wasnt much time for rule making however in jacks short tenure as protector and the island was shut off which left MiB powerless. We also should assume that MiB didnt feel any different once Jack was made protector as he had to be told that Jack took the job as protector. Since there was no need to masquerade around as locke anymore (the jig was up) why not change into someone better looking once he got to the mainland.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The United Kingdom of England-Land
    Posts
    1,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lostsense View Post
    We also should assume that MiB didnt feel any different once Jack was made protector as he had to be told that Jack took the job as protector. Since there was no need to masquerade around as locke anymore (the jig was up) why not change into someone better looking once he got to the mainland.
    When was he told that? I remember MiB meeting up with Jack and realising he had taken the job.
    Best Thread On Lostpedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Erowyn View Post
    Jabob? Sounds Jamaican….
    Team Jacob

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt A.M View Post
    When was he told that? I remember MiB meeting up with Jack and realising he had taken the job.
    youre right, checked the transcript. As is the case with most things, its a little vague. He talks to sawyer first and may be unaware that theres been a new protector named. But when he sees jack, he knows instantly its him.

    LOCKE: Do you know why I'm here?

    SAWYER: I'm guessing you need Desmond to destroy the island.

    LOCKE: That's absolutely right.

    SAWYER: Then what, Smokey? You going down with the ship? Suicide doesn't seem like your style.

    LOCKE: I'm not going down with anything. But you and the rest of Jacob's little "candidates", absolutely are.

    SAWYER: We're not candidates anymore.

    Locke approaches Jack.]

    LOCKE: So it's you.

    JACK: Yeah. It's me.

    LOCKE: Jacob being who he is, I expected to be a little more surprised. You're sort of the obvious choice, don't you think?

    JACK: He didn't choose me. I volunteered.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Choekaas View Post
    People tend to forget the rules that we are given in "Stranger in a Strange Land", a set of rules most likely from Jacob (since they remind of the rules of Mother/Jacob's rules)

    Juliet was sentenced to death by the Rules to the Others because:
    - She killed one of their own, Danny Pickett. In other words: [I]An "Other" is not allowed to kill another "Other". [/I]
    - She gave Jack instructions to kill Ben. An "Other" can't kill another "Other" indirectly (through another person that is not one of them)

    These crimes are, by the rules, punished with execution.


    Even though I find it very weird that it's punished by execution, and not banishment (which makes most logical sense considering what we know about The Others now).
    But I find it interesting to put these rules up to. Makes me think more about the rules Ben mentions in "The Shape of Things to Come" and probably what he meant with Widmore breaking the rules.

    but they're always killing one another , Widmore kills his pal in 1954 , mikhail kills Klugh , and the 2 women in the looking glass

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The United Kingdom of England-Land
    Posts
    1,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stan kubrick View Post
    but they're always killing one another , Widmore kills his pal in 1954 , mikhail kills Klugh , and the 2 women in the looking glass
    Juliet was acting directly against the Others whereas Widmore and Mikhail were trying to protect the Island/the Others.
    Best Thread On Lostpedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Erowyn View Post
    Jabob? Sounds Jamaican….
    Team Jacob

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt A.M View Post
    Juliet was acting directly against the Others whereas Widmore and Mikhail were trying to protect the Island/the Others.
    don't see how killing the women in the looking glass was protecting the island . nor the other cases actually .

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts