Lostpedia Forums

Go Back   Lostpedia Forums > English Forums > Lost Rewatch > Season 1

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-16-2009, 12:40 PM
Lorite Lorite is offline
Stranded
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 52
Default

I think these are fantastic points W-Jim. Regarding Jack, after this episode I really really liked his character, though things do unravel later on and my feelings towards him have certainly changed much, but I've defended him much throughout the series.

What I think this episode does is sow seeds for some of the problems that crop up later for Jack. But in a deeper sense (and this is something of what you make in your second point), Jack is a bit crazy in his determination sometimes and that's not necessarily a bad thing. Most rational pragmatists would have given up the fight probably either trying to find Charlie/Claire or in trying to resuscitate Charlie.

Jack IS a highly principled character, BUT I think his principle lies within satiating his CONSCIENCE and not anything much higher or noble. It's why his despair is so real after he leaves the island. He's desperate to get back and help everyone because he feels so deeply in his conscience that he made a terrible mistake. It destroys him inside. I think the events in White Rabbit, both flashback and island, point to this about him.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-16-2009, 02:40 PM
Anfield Fox's Avatar
Anfield Fox Anfield Fox is offline
Lostie
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorite View Post

Jack IS a highly principled character, BUT I think his principle lies within satiating his CONSCIENCE and not anything much higher or noble. It's why his despair is so real after he leaves the island. He's desperate to get back and help everyone because he feels so deeply in his conscience that he made a terrible mistake. It destroys him inside. I think the events in White Rabbit, both flashback and island, point to this about him.
Wow what a great paragraph. Agree 100%.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-16-2009, 05:08 PM
Lost Fan 4815162342's Avatar
Lost Fan 4815162342 Lost Fan 4815162342 is offline
Redshirt
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: On the run, like Vincent
Posts: 967
Default

A lot of that flashback didn't make a lot of sense to me and that's why I think it worked well for this story.

For Jack to barge in on another surgery and take over would have been an incident and infraction that would have certainly crept in the convo by the investigating hospital officials, if not amongst each other, then outrightly in the report as a questionable action or discussion point because that doesn't fit with my understanding of surgical protocol. Granted Jack was right but just doing that would have gotten the nurse put on probation most likely and raised Jack's profile as possible troublemaker or at least someone with poor decision skills. Much as hospitals want to help patients, they don't like disruption in the organizationsl structure (some for good reasons and others not). So it was noble act by Jack on one level, but it was also done with poor judgment, much like —

— Jack's pursuit of Claire. He's totally off the rez here. He's not thinking clearly. Locke's point was dead on. The group did not need to risk its own doctor, but Jack had that crazed look in his eyes that told you this guy's "drunk" and out of control. "Addictive" (or otherwise dysfunctional) personalities don't always need substances to abuse. They can use situations or other people.

So while it was overall a good outcome in that Jack saved Charlie's life, it was, like the flashback surgery, handled poorly. It's apropos that it happened with a rainy, muddy scene. It's really a good look inside Jack's personality, and why he's not yet suited to be the leader.
__________________



Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-16-2009, 06:18 PM
Lorite Lorite is offline
Stranded
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 52
Default

Right on. I don't know much about hospital protocol (except from early seasons of ER) but that seems to make a lot of sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Fan 4815162342 View Post
It's really a good look inside Jack's personality, and why he's not yet suited to be the leader.
I'm drawn back to Sawyer's damning criticism of Jack's leadership style after Jack comes back to the island in 1977. Was he EVER a good leader!? Jack was the de facto leader until he left, so my question is moot. But it's interesting to see the seeds sown right at the beginning. I LOVE this episode! But I generally love all of Jack's episodes; he's always SO conflicted!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-16-2009, 06:57 PM
hyperchord24 hyperchord24 is offline
Ate Ben’s Leftovers
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 125
Default

During the whole rewatch, I'm really getting the whole theme of Jack not being able to let go. Then I think to myself, that's exactly what he's doing in the season 5 finale. He can't let go of the fact that all these people died in flight 815 and the turmoil that the island caused and wants to "erase" all that by following Faraday's plan. Everyone's telling him to let it go, but he doesn't want to. I really want to say, well, when ever he can't let things go, it blows up in his face. That this whoile theme of "letting it go" is foreshadowing for Jack's involvement in causing the incident. But after seeing him resusitate Charlie, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-16-2009, 07:27 PM
Lorite Lorite is offline
Stranded
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 52
Default

I definitely see what your saying. Sometimes Jack's persistence pays off (i.e. saving Charlie), but sometimes (probably most of the time) is results in crazy nonsense (i.e. setting off a nuke, allowing the freighter folks to come).

He makes a promise to himself (say: Get everyone off the island) and he breaks his back trying to get it done, and after a while really has no clear answer for WHY it's necessary, just that he MUST do it because he said he would.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-17-2009, 04:42 AM
MM0602's Avatar
MM0602 MM0602 is offline
Plays the Lottery
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 336
Default

This had lots of good character moments. Boone starting to follow Locke, Michael being a bad daddy and leaving Walt again, Sayid and Sawyer starting to talk to each other... and of course the Charlie fake death. I didn't remember but after this and White Rabbit, apparently Jack centric episodes used to be really good
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-17-2009, 05:50 PM
hailey's Avatar
hailey hailey is offline
In Room 23
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ontario
Posts: 2,617
Default

is there anyone on lost who DOESNT have daddy issues?
jack, kate, locke, sun, jin, walt, aaron, claire, miles, penny, hurley, sawyer.... im sure the list goes on.
im actually only half way through the episode, but i just had to comment.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-17-2009, 06:25 PM
hailey's Avatar
hailey hailey is offline
In Room 23
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ontario
Posts: 2,617
Default

kate says boone is safest with locke...and flash to them finding the hatch. wonderful.

thank you jack for not giving up on charlie....that was a seriously tense moment. im not always kates #1 fan, but the way she acted and looked in this scene made me want to hug her. this was a very well acted scene....
its funny to watch these first episodes..knowing what we know now...i mean...evil ethan?? we were there for his birth....crazy.

flashbacks make me think, we were friggin time travellers way before the losties. haha
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-17-2009, 06:43 PM
Citic's Avatar
Citic Citic is offline
Lostie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NoVa
Posts: 1,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Fan 4815162342 View Post
A lot of that flashback didn't make a lot of sense to me and that's why I think it worked well for this story.

For Jack to barge in on another surgery and take over would have been an incident and infraction that would have certainly crept in the convo by the investigating hospital officials, if not amongst each other, then outrightly in the report as a questionable action or discussion point because that doesn't fit with my understanding of surgical protocol. Granted Jack was right but just doing that would have gotten the nurse put on probation most likely and raised Jack's profile as possible troublemaker or at least someone with poor decision skills. Much as hospitals want to help patients, they don't like disruption in the organizationsl structure (some for good reasons and others not). So it was noble act by Jack on one level, but it was also done with poor judgment, much like —

Jack's pursuit of Claire. He's totally off the rez here. He's not thinking clearly. Locke's point was dead on. The group did not need to risk its own doctor, but Jack had that crazed look in his eyes that told you this guy's "drunk" and out of control. "Addictive" (or otherwise dysfunctional) personalities don't always need substances to abuse. They can use situations or other people.
So while it was overall a good outcome in that Jack saved Charlie's life, it was, like the flashback surgery, handled poorly. It's apropos that it happened with a rainy, muddy scene. It's really a good look inside Jack's personality, and why he's not yet suited to be the leader.
But thats what makes jack jack.. his devotion and dedication to his people.. also the fact that he knows he made a mistake, he wants to fix it and make it right..
Get'em jack
__________________
A tiger don't change its stripes...
The 2nd to last Jack fan.
Jack pulling the trigger aimed at Lockes head- Best Jack moment ever.
Hoping Jack will be the new Jacob.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forum SEO by Zoints